String breakage in relation to hammer mass

[Brian Trout]

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
Hi Brian,

Not to be obnoxious here, but perhaps the formula may have some =
relevance.

Although we're not dealing with parameters of light speed, the formula =
does give a very basic premise that will apply to much of the physical =
world.

In this formula, it is demonstrated that an increase in mass will also =
bring about an increase in energy if the formula is to remain valid.  =
Any change on one side of the "=3D" sign would also need to be reflected =
on the other side of the "=3D" sign to maintain the ratio implied.  ... =
Just thinkin' in cyberspace...

Hope you're having a nice weekend.  It's been a busy one here.

Best wishes,=20

Brian Trout
Quarryville, PA
btrout@desupernet.net

  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Brian Holden=20
  To: pianotech@ptg.org=20
  Sent: Sunday, November 28, 1999 2:32 PM
  Subject: Re: String breakage in relation to hammer mass


  PS,  Jim's formula: E =3D mc2  (energy =3D mass x speed of light2) =
would have little to do with the breaking string problem methinks - BH.=20
    -----Original Message-----
    From: M J & L V Ashby <mjashby@xtra.co.nz>
    To: Piano List <pianotech@ptg.org>
    Date: Sunday, 28 November 1999 21:32
    Subject: String breakage in relation to hammer mass


    If a hammer is unusually heavy will it contribute to string =
breakage?

    Michael=20

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/11/2f/7e/16/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--