TuneLab

[Greg Newell]

Richard,
    Let me refer you to Bob himself for the technicals as he is much more the definitive
answer than anything I could give. E-mail address    rscott@wwnet.net

Greg

Richard Moody wrote:

> ----------
> > From: Greg Newell <gnewell@EN.COM>
> > To: rockymtn@sprynet.com; pianotech@ptg.org
> > Subject: TuneLab
> > Date: Friday, September 17, 1999 12:45 PM
> >
> > Glenn,
> >
> >     Your situation is perfect for TuneLab. I know I sound like I sell it
> > or something but......, Try it you have absolutely nothing to loose!  Good info on
> screen, runs on very
> > little memory, auto note step or find. I can't even list all the
> > details. Ya gotta at least try it.
> >             Greg
> >
> > P.S. how's that? did I try hard enough?
>
> The display is super.  You  can read it all the way across the room. Which is good
> when using it in the shop on a stationary desktop
>
> It seems very sensitive.  I can get the "blocks" to move by "breathing" on the
> string. This I would like to compare to the OETD's.
>
> Re this sensitivity.  Is it consistant?  I didn't realize my Roland Juno-60 drifted
> so much within 1/10 cent. (10/100) It is analog.
>
> It measures a quartz "pocket" tuner consistantly with in .01 cent. Shows a
> deflection at .02 cents. The variations of the tuner are to .46 and shows it 3.22
> cents flat.  Hmm time to check my sampling rate. At least both are consistant, since
> the readings are always the same.
>
> ---ric
>