Richard writes:
<< There is simply no doubt that most, if not all western music sounds
delightfull
in ET. That it can also sound delightfull in other temperament colourings is
simply another fact.>>
Greetings,
I must disagree. This statement posits that there is no value
difference in the use of various temperaments. Based on what I am seeing,
there are a growing number of pianists that, after being introduced to the
alternatives, use words other than "delightful" to describe ET . "Boring"
"tedious" and "edgy" are three common adjectives I hear.
>>Those who say otherwise speak only for themselves and refer
to no universal truth whatsoever. Indeed, such opinion speaks of a complete
failure to understand the basic nature of art to begin with. <<
I dunno about "universal" truths, but there is a profound difference
between the two tuning styles mentioned. The big difference I am seeing is
that after listening to their piano in a well tempered tuning, the
heretofore equally tempered musician rarely wants to return to ET. After 5
years of providing these tunings, I have had six customers that wanted to
return to ET. My clientele is now about 70 % well tempered, and I don't
think my understanding of the "art" has been diminished because of it.
I would like to hear Richard's defininition on "the basic nature
of art", since it appears that this is something he feels is not grasped by
people who have a preference in temperament.
Regards,
Ed Foote RPT
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC