This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment Hi, I think we all like the system we started with. I started with Dr. Al's rotating lights, and I got used to them. I have progressed from the S.O.T., to the SAT, through the different upgrades. I now have a SAT lll. I like it because it is user friendly, compact, battery life is great = and no one would think of stealing it, if left unattended. I really like the = automatic note advance feature. It is compact enough to place anywhere on the = piano. It is also a great learning tool, if you want to test your own tunings = against an FAC one. It will compare and give you the results. The FAC gave me an 95%+ on the tuning exam with ETD. The only downside, with all ETD's is, that you should learn aurally = first, because if you don't, you may never. Just ask me, I keep on meaning to pass the aural part of the exam, but I just never get around to = practising enough. Regards, John M. Ross Windsor, Nova Scotia, Canada. ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Doug Garman=20 To: pianotech@ptg.org=20 Sent: Friday, August 18, 2000 10:44 PM Subject: Which ETD? OK folks. I'm considering purchasing my first ETD. Simple question = -- which one should I get and why? I'll stand way back from the screen = and wait for your responses. :o) Doug Garman, Associate Ft. Worth Chapter ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/be/5f/3b/00/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC