JIMRPT@AOL.COM wrote: > > In a message dated 7/30/2000 1:29:06 AM, tunemwell@rcn.com writes: > > << Is there any way to ban an undesirable from the list? Pardon if this has > already come up. I've been away and I'm going through stuff. > Dan J >> > > and he referenced: > > JIMRPT@AOL.COM wrote: > <<<<"In a message dated 7/27/2000 7:33:10 PM, cmpiano@earthlink.net writes: > > << Gina!!! will that resolution pass the constitutionality test of the > supreme > > court?">>>> > > Geez Dan, you colonial types are verrry direct aren't you? :-) I'm Just Not > Sure of the infraction that I, or Gina or Carl might be guilty of that is > such an offense as to warrant the removal of one of us. > I can't imagine that I would be your target so..........inquiring mind wants > to know-Whom doest thou haveth in thy mind? > Jim Bryant (FL) Jim, I'm terribly sorry ....I thought if I responded to the thread that the title carried and the previous ones had been read it would be obvious. I've been known to be very oblique. I have been helped and entertained by yours and the many others who post here with all their experience and expertise. Sometimes at 2am I'm not as careful as I should be - so I'll try to watch it. After posting what I did I had second thoughts about the concept of being able to banish anyone - and it's not a very good way to encourage free thought - something we colonials tend to cherish...so I apologize all the way 'round. My undesirable was the topic related schizophrenic or otherwise simply devious miscreant who was heating up the fires with his mindless Jeckle/Hyde manner. That David guy who started the Why tune sequence. Thank you to whoever (I'm sorry I can't remember if it was Ed F or Ron ) got his name and address - I've filed it for reference. You guys are all remarkable and you dispatched this fellow with great panache. Thanks for listening and "God save the Colonies"! Dan Jackson Wmbg VA
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC