This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Roger Jolly <baldyam@sk.sympatico.ca>
To: <pianotech@ptg.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2000 7:55 PM
Subject: Re: String coupling.
Also in every case, the unison sounded rougher than I can tune it =
aurally.
Touching up aurally, the unison pitch drop disappeared again, or was
greatly reduced. Checking each string individually against the display,
they weren't precisely the same anymore, but the unison as a whole was =
on
pitch and sounded good.=20
Why?
=20
Because it was done aurally!!
Hi Ron,
At least you restored my sanity, well the little that I =
never
had. With a new set of hammers, very carefully mated to the strings, I =
have
noted that the partial pattern is very different on the centre string, =
by
single straight line needling up the cup line to pop the cup and then =
re
mating, similar patterns were obtained on all 3 strings.
Card, level the strings....no "popping" the "cup line??" then remate???
Simpley shape the the hammers (eliminates the "cup") then voice!!
The ETD unison will now both show and sound correct.
=20
The only conclusion on my part is that the ear is a remarkable =
instrument, in that it can
compensate in a manner that is amazing, when dealing with slightly =
false
beats and mis aligned partials.
Then learn to use it!
Please pass the straight jacket.
It's all yours. 8~)
Bob Moffatt=20
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/cc/db/b8/51/attachment.htm
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC