Manufacturer University Deals

[Richard Brekne]

Well said Ron.. Same theme again.... sheeshh what this industry allows itself to
be subjected too...what crap we accept in the name of...er.... realities... what
standards we are willing to say are in the end ok because of this, that or the
other reason.

We are too kind..... way to kind. Nice to want to help folks out... but what is
really help and what is actually counter productive eh ??

Ron Nossaman wrote:

> ><<"The ethics depends on the dealer.">>
> >
> >Et Al;
> > This quote from Dave says it all and it applies to the Schools' ethics, the
> >Manufacturers' ethics, The Sale Firm running the sale(if any) as well as the
> >dealer. 'IF' there is a lack of ethics/oversight in any of these parts there
> >might be questionable tactics, a.k.a. 'ethics', used...................or at
> >least leaves the possibility open.
> >Jim Bryant (FL)
>
> Yessir. Then again, in present society, by sanctioned convention - Ethics =
> income potential / legal accountability. As long as the vigilante committee
> lacks adequate grounds (or conviction) to mobilize, the ethics quotient
> yield remains > 1.0 by virtue of the positive tally in the black. Fallout
> be damned. Two wrongs don't have to make a right, as long as they can make
> a profit by which they can defend themselves. That's a rule, if not the
> law. I seem to remember a few comments on the List not that long ago ( and
> certainly not by you ) along the lines that it doesn't matter how it's
> generated, as long as it's bankable. Once it's in the account, it's good as
> gold.
>
> Well, bankable it may be, but shame on the practitioners.
>
> ... must be bedtime...
>
> Ron N

--
Richard Brekne
RPT, N.P.T.F.
Bergen, Norway