Richard We toured the R&D facility at Kimball back in the 80's. They had run a series of tests on wood surfaces and bonding strengths. Their conclusion was the smoother the surface the stronger the bond. I don't know where or how you can get that information, but I found it quite interesting. They recommended very sharp cutting tools that shear material not tear or compress the wood fibers. The latter showed a marked decrease in bonding strength. They contended they found incredible strengths with common white glues that had proper gluing surfaces. Paul Chick ----- Original Message ----- From: Richard Moody <remoody@midstatesd.net> To: piano tech <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: Sunday, September 24, 2000 1:27 AM Subject: prepping glue joints > > > > > > > >Well show us his scientific evidence so we can make up our own minds. > > > > > > > > For starters you can check out his "Understanding Woods" & > > "Identifying Woods" if you want see if he seems to know something > > about wood or not. > > Both of his books are available from Schaff. > Here is another "authority" http://www.titebond.com/default.asp They even > have an 800 tech support number. > > > > Aside from contamination, Hoadley noted that freshly planed or fine > > sanded surfaces will take a much better glue joint than a "roughened" > > or scored surface. > >Patrick > > This is what I was asking for scientific (experimental results) about. Have > they tested the planed surfaces against the scored surfaces? Because I was > taught to score some surfaces I would like to know if that practice is now > outdated, or applicable only to newer glues. ---ric > > >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC