Improving Projection..

jolly roger baldyam@sk.sympatico.ca
Thu, 15 Mar 2001 19:10:33 -0600


Hi Richard,
                  The new Wurlitzers now have Renner hammers, for this very
reason.
No more juice, and they are a little softer than the commercial sets. Made
to order.
Roger.

P.S. I have been involved with the new specification changes.  And we are
seeing quite a few improvements, with more to come. 


At 07:28 PM 3/15/01 +0100, you wrote:
>Well,, of course one has to bow to years of experience. And if you are so
>familiar with these pianos that you can without hesitation recommend this,
>well I have no doubt your advise would be sound.
>
>Still, I have to wonder without any knowledge of what kind of condition the
>piano is in, (granted we have to assume its kinda beat until told
>differently), what kind of room acoustics there are, and what kind of budjet
>the fellow is given to work with, just what we can tell him (outside of the
>hypothetical) that will really be of much help.
>
>Newton Hunt wrote:
>
>> > Seriously tho Newton... arent you throwing out some hasty advice here ??
>>
>> Yea, I am.
>>
>> Two reasons.
>>
>> 1.  There are several approaches to the problem and having enough data
>> to go to any choice is a real time saver.
>
>So... what data did we have ?
>
>> 2.  I know that type of hammer and know how it restricts the piano.
>>
>
>I bow to your experience on this point to be sure. And I would love to hear
>more about them.
>
>>
>> Yeah, I give advise but not always the years of experience behind that
>> advise.  A failing of mine.
>>
>>                 Newton
>
>I would hardly call that a failing.... besides... made for some good target
>shooting. (shoot... missed again..grin)
>
>--
>Richard Brekne
>RPT, N.P.T.F.
>Bergen, Norway
>mailto:Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no
> 



This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC