This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
Hi Bill
Comments below and all your questions and thoughts have merit.
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Billbrpt@AOL.COM=20
To: pianotech@ptg.org=20
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 8:33 AM
Subject: Re: Ditch the tuning pin bushings
In a message dated 5/11/01 10:01:52 AM Central Daylight Time, =20
Erwinpiano@email.msn.com (Erwinpiano) writes:=20
My solution was to fully fit the block with a good plate fange contact =
and eliminate the bushing. The piano tunes like a dream(Bolduc =
block)yeah=20
baby. Enough said?=20
Back in the late 1070's and early 1980's when I was interested in the=20
rebuilding end of the business, many people were putting plate bushings =
in=20
Steinways. The word from Steinway at the time (and probably still is) =
was=20
exactly the same reasoning that you put forth here, Dale.=20
Dittos to the stwy argument Bill
My only question about that is how far the tuning pin coil ended up =
being=20
from the top of the pinblock.
This is an obvious concern but it's interesting that I still =
haven't found it to be much of an inhibitor to getting the ppiano to =
STAY in tune. Also just tap them in till your happy with the height =
and retune(Iv'e done this a few times)
In some cases, it seems to me, the lack of a=20
plate bushing really creates a bad "flagpole" effect. Couldn't a well =
fitted=20
pinblock *and* good, hard maple plate bushings make an even better=20
arrangement than simply one or the other?=20
Yes but would it be overkill or just possibly a caddilac feature the =
does give a bit smoother drive.
What's your and any others opinion on that, please?=20
Bill Bremmer RPT=20
Madison, Wisconsin=20
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/02/f9/b8/a4/attachment.htm
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC