New hammers for Hamilton school piano

Joseph Garrett joegarrett@earthlink.net
Thu, 24 May 2001 15:17:23 -0700


Oh really Del,
And what part of your remanufacture/rebuild business uses ecsaine? Haven't
heard you espousing it's virtues before. And while we're at it how come you
didn't come to the rescue of the newer Hamilton's problems, seeing as how
it's your redesign, (according to a conversation we had a few years ago.):-)
Joe Garrett, R.P.T.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Delwin D Fandrich" <pianobuilders@olynet.com>
To: <pianotech@ptg.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 10:37 PM
Subject: Re: New hammers for Hamilton school piano


>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joseph Garrett" <joegarrett@earthlink.net>
> To: <pianotech@ptg.org>
> Sent: May 23, 2001 5:24 PM
> Subject: Re: New hammers for Hamilton school piano
>
>
> > Ron,
> > What's wrong with real Buckskin? It has proven to be far superior to
> > anything else including the synthetics, (whatever the sales idiots
choose
> to
> > call it), since time immemorial. My choice every time.
> > Regards
> > Joe Garrett, R.P.T.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> In what way is buckskin all that superior? In the tests I monitored the
> Ecsaine outperformed several varieties of buckskin by margins ranging from
> 1.5:1 up to 3:1. It was more predictable in terms of thickness, complience
> and overall quality. It was more stable. It was not cheaper.
>
> Regards,
>
> Del
>
>



This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC