Greetings, <<On modern grands, fourths tuned to a 1/4 comma sound bad! Umm, well, yes, depending on what is being played. A piano tuned in 1/4 C offered unacceptable amounts of dissonance to my clientele, though some jazzers found the comma useful as a motif in some impromtu extemporizing. Even though the busy fifths are noticeable, it was those 41 cent dim4ths that set everyone free! I am assured that the 13th and 14 century music depended on some terrifically tempered intervals(by our modern standards), and their contrast witht the Just purity of others. Perhaps ET represents the end of the line for intonation's evolution. Many of the cutting-edge composers I have been reading of are involved in ET, but of the 19ET and 53ET, plus the NbasedETs. Equality in such fine divisions of the octave allows intervals that can mimic all the widths available in the WT's , however, keyboard instruments are not easily built to such specs, and it is the synthesizers that are capable of this sort of intonation. The modern piano may not gracefully admit the meantone tunings, but there has been a huge response to non-ET tunings that create much less contrast. >From the noviate's perspective, there is more difference between ET and the late 19th century "Broadwood" than between that Broadwood tuning and any of the other WT's. Even a little departure from strict, clinical, mathematically exact ET produces strong reactions from musicians. I think there is rarely a need to go all the way to 1/4 Comma. Regards, Ed Foote RPT
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC