If I am not mistaken, the differences between the several machines/programs is even greater (with respect to SAT and Veritune at least - and I think RCT). Yes, the SAT samples three notes, but only one set of partials from each of the three notes it samples. The Veritune samples 88 notes, and I believe it incorporates numerous partial frequencies from each of the 88 notes it samples to calculate its tuning. I think it is also important to point out here that all the above applies only to using the machine in its automatic-calculated-tuning mode - where it calculates an 88-note tuning (and of course you can easily adjust the tuning with the SAT III's DOB feature). Use of the SAT in direct tuning mode is something very different and does not lend itself to comparison with the Verituner (or can the Verituner do that also???). Many techs use the SAT in direct tune mode and completely bypass the FAC tuning calculation and its inherent limitations (not that those are all that significant, IMHO). The direct tuning mode basically does everything that an aural tuner does (arguably more precisely), but you get a visual display rather than (or in addition to) just listening to whatever partials the aural tuning is listening to. I am very interested in giving the Verituner a whirl. I would buy one today but I just spent that same amount of money on a bicycle! Oh, well - I just tune a bunch more pianos. Terry Farrell ----- Original Message ----- From: <LHSBAND440@AOL.COM> To: <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2001 7:13 PM Subject: very simple > SAT - LISTENS TO 3 NOTES AND SETS THE ENTIRE TEMPERAMENT > > RCT - MEASURES SEVERAL A'S AND SETS THE ENTIRE TEMPERAMENT > > VERITUNE - LISTENS TO 88 NOTES AND ADJUSTS THE TEMPERAMENT WITH EACH NOTE > > LEO SILVERMAN
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC