Ron Nossaman wrote: > >There still remains to be written the definitive treatise on the Front Duplex. > >Most of what has been published on the subject is either speculative or > >declarative in nature, without support hard data to back up any assertions > >made. > > And how do you know you haven't already read it and just didn't recognize > it as the good stuff? Oh thats simple to answer.... Declaratives and Speculatives are what they are per grammatical definition... and lack of hard data is ...well exactly that. > That's the basic problem with comparing other > peoples' opinions to arrive at truth without actually getting some on you. > Knowledge is a kit, after all, and we have to make and remake a lot of our > own pieces to fill gaps and connect parts. Without knowing how conflicting > information was arrived at, and what assumptions are blended into the > aggregate, it's hard to reach conclusions by sifting rumors. Consider too, > that the definitive ANYTHING of today too easily becomes the entrenched > dogma of tomorrow - like the tuned front duplex did in the first place. > > Ron N Er..... sorry folks if I stepped on any toes. I just wrote basically, that there were two opposing schools of thoughts and nobody has proven anything yet.... I thought that was a neutural enough position to take while answering in part a loaded question to begin with... I guess if you try and take away the chance to argue about something... well you will get argument about that as well then...grin. Welcome to Jamaica Have a Nice Day -- Richard Brekne RPT, N.P.T.F. Bergen, Norway mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC