Verituner

[antares]

> From: "Kevin E. Ramsey" <ramsey@extremezone.com>
> Reply-To: pianotech@ptg.org
> Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2001 18:55:12 -0700
> To: <pianotech@ptg.org>
> Subject: Re: Verituner
> 
> Paul, I think that he is referring to the phenomena of a piano that is
> repeatedly tuned to the exact same place becoming more and more stable and
> settled. I think I wrote on that subject recently.

No Kevin, I have tuned more pianos than most so I know about a piano getting
more beautiful and stable after a couple of times in just a few days.
With this Verituner it is a different story : the Verituner improves the
first tuning (on the same instrument) and the third one will be better and
the fourth one.... etc etc.
That is because it continually adds and recalculates the latest incoming new
data. 
At a certain moment that very tuning has become faultless and utterly
balanced, and that is a rare situation if you know what I am saying.



friendly greetings
from

Antares,

Amsterdam, Holland

"where music is, no harm can be"

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <larudee@pacbell.net>
> To: <pianotech@ptg.org>
> Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 4:35 PM
> Subject: Re: Verituner
> 
> 
>> antares wrote:
>> 
>>> The first tuning with the VT was
>>> impressive to say the least and the second tuning was stunning!
>> 
>> Why should there be a discrepancy between the two?
>> 
>>> I personally can not achieve that despite all my training and talent.
>> 
>> Why would VT be so much better if it is using the same procedure as an
> aural
>> tuning?
>> 
>>> I also tune with the VT in the Concertgebouw in Amsterdam. If you have
> tuned
>>> a STW D a number of times with the VT the instrument will sound like
>>> something you have never heard before, believe me! All intervals are
> crystal
>>> clear and incredibly even.
>> 
>> I value your description of the results, but what is there in the VT
> procedure
>> that would account for that?
>> 
>> Paul Larudee
> 
>