| Let me suggest that a more realistic Tuneoff Challenge would allow the | machine user (Jim) to tune unisons by ear, since that is how the machines | are most commonly used. | -Robert Scott Robert.... Yes I agree (actually from what I have heard) that machines are not used to tune unisons. So perhaps the tune off should reflect how the machines are actually used in practice. Well Jim proposed the machine for unisons and I concur. He being on the machine side (this time (hint hint hint)) must have a reason. I am sure there will be other tuneoffs and these could feature different issues. I would like to ask another question. Why are not machines used to tune unisons in practice, or are they? Unisons to me are the second hardest interval to tune, actually tune it so it ISN'T an interval : ) . I would think machines would be of great help. You could check each partial with a machine where you can't by ear. ( I suppose there are ways but I mean practical also in the field) I have tested your Tunelab program against a quartz pitchsource and TL and the quartz agreed time after time and even up to 6 months. This I take to mean neither varied. So if you have a non-variable measuring device I think one can claim accuracy. Also it was fun to listen to one beat in 100 seconds since both your program and the quartz source have audio out. I think it was one beat per 98 seconds before a difference could be heard. With this accuracy I would think machines might have an edge over the ear tuning unisons. Yet it is often said the machine is not used to tune unisons. I wonder why? ---ric ----- Original Message ----- From: Robert Scott <rscott@wwnet.net> To: <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2001 12:28 PM Subject: Re: Tuneoff challenge | Let me suggest that a more realistic Tuneoff Challenge would allow the | machine user (Jim) to tune unisons by ear, since that is how the machines | are most commonly used. | -Robert Scott | Detroit/Windsor Chapter |
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC