THE SOLUTION FOR TERRORISM

[jolly roger]

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
Hi Clyde,
               Make no mistake there while there is great support
Internationally for America over this horrendous disaster.  There is also a
great deal of pressure to exercise temperance.

This is not AMERICA'S  NEW  WAR as you your press likes to brag and glorify, 
but a global problem.  Travel out side your own country, and you will see an
entirely different perspective.

My home city in the UK is home to the Royal Marine Commando unit's. They are
already in Afghanistan.   Just like they were first  to go in, in the gulf
war.

The Royal Air Force was responsible for taking out most of the air fields in
that war.   They quite efficiently grounded the Iraqi Air force.  Then the
killing spree started in Bagdad.   We all know what that solved.   There is
some mounting pressure in the UK that America does not conduct a repeat
performance.  

This not America's private war.   And America is not going to be the same.
The
International community is hopefully going to force the US to be accountable
for their foreign policy.   90 day company balance sheets will no longer cut
it. 

Regards Roger



At 12:08 PM 9/29/01 -0400, you wrote: 
>
> This morning's paper included the following line:  "Bush directed the
release
> of $25 million to assist refugees streaming into countries bordering
> Afghanistan." 
>
> I would also like to point out that the article that started this thread had
> as its title "Incredible Idea to Add to the Solution for Terrorism."  It was
> not given as the only approach.  Indeed, if you reread the article you will
> see it asks for turning over the terrorists in return.  It was one idea to
> consider among the ways the U.S. can respond. 
>
> I am encouraged by what I consider level-headed thinking on a number of
> fronts.  If we object to violence, why respond with violence?  If we object
> to terrorism, why respond with terrorism? 
>
> Never fear, the American government is not going to roll over and play
dead. 
> Looking for long-term solutions and working through diplomatic channels as
> much as possible seems to me to be the way to go.  Much as some would
like to
> see quick retaliation to pacify our pain and our smarting national pride, I
> doubt that will result in a better world, and it could actually propel us
> into a war that will take many more than 6,000 lives. 
>
> Regards, Clyde 
>
> Wimblees@AOL.COM wrote: 
>>
>> Perhaps the President has already taken the thought of providing
>> humanitarian aid as a means of fighting terrorism. It will not be the only
>> way, but it will certainly go a long way towards peace. And that is what we
>> all want, isn''t it?
>




---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/6c/53/69/45/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--