---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
In a message dated 7/31/2002 4:31:08 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no writes:
> Phil Bondi wrote:
> >
> > There was alot of sizzle(for lack of a better word) at FFF on various
> notes.
> >
> > -Using a single needled tool, deep needle twice on either side of the
> strike
> > point, around 10:00..
> > -1 deep needle per side into the side of the hammer, as close to the
> strike
> > point without seeing the needle.
> >
> > This gave favorable results..actually, darn good results.
>
Phil
There is a reason your results were more favorable by going deep with
a couple strokes rather than the more temporary method of (sugar or top
coating) shallow strokes in the strike point. Your changing the string
contact time and the shape of the traveling wave which has in it the encoded
tonal information. Neat huh? Also Practice using the single needle tech as a
felt density probe. There is a feel that can be developed with practice as to
when a spot in the hammer is too hard or not. This is a very effective tool.
On hard (or very stiff) hammers it's possible to over needle the shouders
and still have to much sizzle (high metalic partials)and not enough clang
(middle partials) or boom ( lower partials). Since the whole hammer is to act
as a variable rate spring the method of excess shoulder needling simply
disconnects the top from the shoulders without much tonal chamge. You can be
just needling away but nothing is happening Wrong. Yes, the shoulders are now
moving but unsupportive. My Opinion is that the shoulders on most hot
pressed or hard hammers are not that strong or supportive of the middle of
the hammer any way so don't over do it.
In the hot pressed hammer the top and directly underneath down to the
molding is still the hardest zone of the hammer. The sizzle sound comes
largely from string compression marks and the too much felt stiffness clear
down to the molding. The felt is not moving.
The clang sound comes from the correct stiffness in the middle and the
boom comes from the shoulders and felt over and around the top of the molding
being less than stone hard -- something like the stiffness of a small super
ball if you wish to have a visual picture.
SOOOO when you deep needle thru the top and and also just at the ends of
the string marks at the appropriate time in the process you affect all three
elements of the sound -- sizzle, clang and boom. This achievable with a
minimum of needle strokes and the effect is far more permanent than shallow
needling. Sustain will improve as well as tonal balance and overall clarity.
This technique is probably non detrimental up to 4-8 strokes. More than that
will (could) weaken the hammer and the tone will remain a bit mushy (or
dark). Not to worry. If you do nothing and the piano plays back in the sound
will recover (usually) to a very nice level. Or use fine sandpaper(400-600)
over the top to file off loose fibers and massage the top which repacks the
felt. Iron, tap with the back of your voicing tool, etc., to recompact the
felt.
Light juice a very last choice. Hey It's not that dangerous.
Shallow needling should IMO be reserved for just minor cleaning up of
the sound. I rarely do it myself.
Voiving --Just the tip of the ice berg.
Dale Erwin
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/63/8f/2f/67/attachment.htm
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC