David Andersen wrote: > > >While I aggree that ET is difficult, nay impossible to get > >just right, (if you take the full definition of ET that is) > What is the full definition of ET? That would be one which takes into consideration all intervals... as opposed to say just a nice even progression of M3rds. Ideally I suppose you could say that a Perfect perfect ET would be on that could only be accomplished on a piano with perfectly even inharmonicities.... or what ? > > >it is not in my experience that the variations / errors in > >temperament represent the most significant differences in > >the tuning styles of accomplished tuners. > > Why would an accomplished aural tuner settle for an inconsistency large > enough to be called an error in his/her temperament? Outside of the fact that everyone does all the time to some degree or another...whether they know it or not, admit it or not.... grin... I cant think of any particularilly good reason. > > Cheers.......David Andersen Prosit ! RicB
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC