> the contiguous 3rds > test is the most valuable and useful tool there could ever be for aural > tuning of ET. It does not matter one iota what all those irrational numbers > are that say it is not exactly a ratio of 4:5. The FACT is that it a a > relationship of "a *little* slower" to "a *little* faster". > William Braide White's instructions did not provide this diagnostic tool. "Thus F#--A# beats faster than F--A, but slower than G--B; G#--C beats faster than G--B but slower than A--C# and so on throughout." William Braid White, _Piano Tuning and Allied Arts_. Chapt IV "The Art of Tuning in Equal Temperament". p 92. (5th edition 1946). See also Table III Beats per second in Equal tempered Intervals. p 68. The first edition of PTAA was 1917. It would be interesting to see if the instructions and beat tables appeared then. From the above there might be some confusion between successive 3rds and contiguous 3rds. Examples of contiguous 3rds are F--A, A--C#, C#(Db)--F, F--A. The beat rates between these are (from table III) 9.43 --11.87 -- 14.95 -- 18.86. White gives examples of two "7-8-9-10" series involving minor 3rds, major 6ths and major 3rds in succession which pretty much locks in ET. (p. 90--93) ---ricm
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC