I guess I've got to wonder would it make a bit of difference in the outcome of the piano? Would a steel, ceramic whatever plate be worth it? David I. ----- Original message ----------------------------------------> From: Delwin D Fandrich <pianobuilders@olynet.com> To: <pianotech@ptg.org> Received: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 23:42:23 -0700 Subject: Re: Foundry Castings >----- Original Message ----- >From: "David Ilvedson" <ilvey@sbcglobal.net> >To: <pianotech@ptg.org> >Sent: August 27, 2002 8:06 PM >Subject: Re: Foundry Castings >> Sure, go on...but I don't see anything in your list that has a compelling >property superior to cast iron...do you? >Yes. Steel for one--given proper tooling. As early as the 1970s steel was >becoming a viable competitor both in terms of performance and in cost. It >would require relatively high production and a fairly sophisticated factory >but it could be done. The advantages would be potentially lower cost (in >quantity), greater strength, lower weight and (probably) better acoustical >performance. >There are several iron alloys other than gray iron that have much to >offer--higher strength at lower weight among them. The Currier Strataphonic >String Panel was a brilliant idea miserably executed. There are a variety of >composites could be made to work quite well though their cost is still >somewhat high. I don't know enough about ceramics yet to be able to predict >their viability, but if you can build an engine block out of the stuff.... >Del
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC