This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
Dale, from your post I assume you assume I'm working on an upright. =
It's a grand. I'm using rocker gauges, Lowell. and Baldwin gauges. No =
consistency. and a real pain to measure.
Just makes me think about a better way to check downbearing.
I'm waiting for inspiration. I'm not holding my breath.
Carl Meyer Assoc. PTG
Santa Clara, California
cmpiano@attbi.com=20
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Erwinspiano@AOL.COM=20
To: pianotech@ptg.org=20
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: Baldwin accu-hitch pins
In a message dated 1/19/2002 3:22:15 PM Pacific Standard Time, =
cmpiano@attbi.com writes:
Subj:Re: Baldwin accu-hitch pins=20
Date:1/19/2002 3:22:15 PM Pacific Standard Time
From:cmpiano@attbi.com
Reply-to:pianotech@ptg.org
To:pianotech@ptg.org
Sent from the Internet=20
Dale, I'm trying to set bearing on a modified Emerson. Modified =
for accujust hitch pins.
From a friend I borrowed the Baldwin instructions.
Briefly::: Without bass strings installed, string treble and set =
bearing to (zero) with strings at pitch. No load on board. =20
Now set specified number of notes starting at bottom to 1 div (.5 =
degrees). Number of notes depending on model of piano. Then next group =
of notes to 2 div (1 degree). Then the last group to 3 div (1 1/2 =
degrees). Lastly install the bass strings and set at pitch to 1 div (.5 =
degrees).
Carl --with what device are you measuring with. May be that's part =
of my confusion. lack of info.
Then I see a note saying -Quote-
A bearing value, previously set, cannot be rechecked because the =
accumulated force of all strings on the bridge will lower the soundboard =
and reduce the settings which were originally set.
>>>>>>>> Just as I said in my post
Pianos equipped with the vertical (acu-just) hitch pins are designed =
to function with a minimum positive bearing at the bridges, compared =
with other pianos with string rests and angled hitch pins. Unquote!!
>>>>>>>>>>Poppy cock. If thats so then crown is not required.
Now if I designed something that had to be adjusted and then =
couldn't be checked, I wouldn't admit it. Just how do you design a =
piano to not need much bearing? Sounds too much like advertising =
garbage mouth to me. Like, "Our piano is so dam good that we don't =
need so much stinkin' down bearing."
Hey--Maybe that's why so many Baldwins sound so dang aweful. Not =
enough bearing.
Carl says
I'm impressed with the idea, but I'm amused at the rhetoric.
Me too but
I think I figured out how iId set it. I would guesstimate some intial =
setting then I would adjust it untill I'd get a lowell gauge reading =
similar to what is normal on other pianos with decent crown. 12 to 15 =
thou. on a fully crowned board
I haven't felt too spunky the last few days so I'm still adjusting =
the bearing on this Emerson. I've noticed that when I started I found =
some bearing with a regular rocker gauge, but no bearing with either the =
Lowell gauge or the Baldwin gauge. Both are a pain to use. I want to =
look into that. When I get it fingered out, then you'll all get the =
finger. Grin. --------- Carl
Carl, As I see it you've got your own stiky wicket as most =
uprightswere designed to have little or no crown. Now what do you do =
with the acu-just? I would opt for the baldwin spec on the upright board =
,which is as you say nominal. Most uprights have little crown(usually =
none) and little bearing and many still sound pretty good. It' a mostly =
mass driven system or not much stiffness due to crown compression or =
bearing load.
Best-----Dale Erwin
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/b2/d2/0e/bc/attachment.htm
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC