Yeah, but how much torque is required to turn the average square grand tuning pin? Not much torque = not much flex = good accuracy! :-) Terry Farrell ----- Original Message ----- From: "phil frankenberg" <rinkyd@pacbell.net> To: <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 4:26 PM Subject: Re: Tuning Square Grands/Tuning Hammer - In theory > Matt > Your argument appears sound, but I have to agree with Joe's assessment. The > longer the lever , the more flex. More flex, less accuracy. > > Phil Frankenberg > Chico, Ca. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Matt Wynne" <ptuner@optonline.net> > To: <pianotech@ptg.org> > Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 3:13 PM > Subject: Re: Tuning Square Grands/Tuning Hammer - In theory > > > > At 11:23 AM 7/1/02 -0700, Joe wrote: > > >. The longer the lever the greater the mechanical > > >leverage AND the lesser is the accuracy! > > > > Hmm...Joe, wouldn't be the other way around? Wouldn't it be greater > accuracy? > > > > Let's view a tuning lever as the radius of a circle, and your hand is at a > > point on the circumference of the circle. > > > > On a normal tuning lever where the radius is 12 inches or so, you may have > > to move your hand, say, 1/4 inch along the circumference of that circle to > > raise a note, say, 2 cents. > > > > When you switch to a longer tuning lever, the circumference is enlarged. > > > > To raise the same note the same 2 cents will require more distance, let's > > say for the sake of argument: 1/2 inch. > > > > Therefore, if the original 1/4 inch of motion will now raise the note 1 > > cent instead of 2, wouldn't you consider that a gain in accuracy? > > > > Food for thought. > > -Matt > > >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC