---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment In a message dated 7/6/2002 12:17:10 PM Pacific Daylight Time, RNossaman@cox.net writes: > Subj:Re: Bridge design > Date:7/6/2002 12:17:10 PM Pacific Daylight Time > From:<A HREF="mailto:RNossaman@cox.net">RNossaman@cox.net</A> > Reply-to:<A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A> > To:<A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A> > Sent from the Internet > > > > > > Terry > >I don't know why they didn't use it. Probably some of the design folks > >liked it and some didn't. Or cost factors and simplified production > issues. > > Terry, Dale, > I don't know either, But have either of you tried to laminate a bridge with > > that shepherd's crook at the end like is in the A? That somehow doesn't > strike me as a production simplification, but maybe it's not that bad after > > you get the jig figured out, and it does stiffen the low tenor. Adding the > transition bridge with a re-design improves the crossover though. > Ron--No I haven't but I bet it's no cake walk. The bridge I'm describing woud be a simplification over the typical shepards crook. Basically the tenor bridge stops and then juts towards the bass 5 or 6 inches. It is attached to the tenor bridge just to be clear. ... Dale Erwin ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/a0/8f/65/32/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC