At 3:54 PM -0400 7/25/02, Erwinspiano@AOL.COM wrote:
>With modern hammer making techniques--very moist felt, lots of steam and
>heat--cracking is less of a problem and thicker felt can more easily be
>used. Considerable resilience is lost in the process but this no longer
>seems to be a desirable characteristic for piano hammers.
>
>Regards,
>
>Anyone
>
>
> O.K. I'll bite Del. It's a mostly, largely
>undesireable charachteristic and detrimental to the kind of piano
>tone I want to be able to develop. I'm guessin you too. But hey
>were( I'm) in the minority. I won't go on with more of the same
>opinion I've expressed before.
>>>>>>Dale Erwin>>>
I actually liked the way Del made his point, guaranteed not to
offend. And he could have. It's one thing to stay that resilience is
not longer the valuable commodity. It's another to say what has
replaced it, namely (dare I speak its name?): streamlined production
processes which produce large quantities in a consistent quality
(whatever it may be).
It is the hammer which has not had its resilience thermoplasticized
out of it which, soft though it may be, is ready for
working-hardening. This "after-market" process really ripens the
resilience, and allows the tone to mature into something great.
Bill Ballard RPT
NH Chapter, P.T.G.
"If you jabber like a jabberwocky and if you walk like a jabberwocky,
You must be a jabberwocky"
........... two punchy guys
+++++++++++++++++++++
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC