This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
Actually, this is a part of the motion being put before the Board at the =
convention concerning whether we should have another classification of =
"Allied Tradesman" which would be someone who rebuilds and/or =
refinishes pianos but does not tune.=20
Start thinking about it now. It's going to come up. I'm neither for =
it or against it.=20
I believe that that's the reason this whole thread got started anyway.=20
=20
Kevin E. Ramsey
ramsey@extremezone.com
----- Original Message -----=20
From: JIMRPT@aol.com=20
To: pianotech@ptg.org=20
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 7:01 AM
Subject: Re: Piano Refinishing
In a message dated 04/06/02 9:38:22 AM, grandrestorations@yahoo.com =
writes:
<< My point is that just because you're not
interested, or I'm not interested, doesn't mean
that no one is interested or that it's not
important or significant. >>
Brian......
Absolutely no offense taken.......but read what I wrote :-) .....I =
didn't=20
say I "wasn't interested"........ what I 'was' speaking to was the=20
speculation of 'why there are not more refinishing articles in the =
JOURNAL'=20
........and I spoke to conserving, but not restricting, the JOURNAL =
space for=20
more direct technical thingees that are piano specific......I even =
mentioned=20
that some refinishing articles would be welcomed by me................ =
Now=20
just how much more accomdating could I be?? ;-)
Are we separated by a common language this morning????
Jim Bryant (FL)
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/b0/ce/02/c1/attachment.htm
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC