This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment ----- Original Message -----=20 From: HazenBannister@cs.com=20 To: pianotech@ptg.org=20 Sent: May 01, 2002 6:25 AM Subject: Re: Hazen's Question re. rescaling/liking/knowing. In a message dated 05/01/2002 7:40:49 AM Eastern Daylight Time, = nhunt@optonline.net writes:=20 List,=20 What I don't understand is ,I can't go by sound,which is what I = know,because in this case a busted pinblock took that option away.So I = don't know how the piano sounded =20 to start with.I noticed yesterday the the pinblock was replaced in = 1960,as it was written on it,so I wonder if the string = sizes(steel)written on the plate are original,or maybe someone has = already changed this.I am relatively new at restringing on my own,and = want to start off right, making good decisions.I have done numerous = pianos(only one in my shop, restringing) I have put on no telling how = many strings in the field,and on a newly strung piano as well in other = shops.But have little or no experience in rescalling.I have the Travis = stringing book with different scales listed,but there might be 3 or 4 = that look like they would work,should I throw a dart?(just kidding).It's = wonderful having vast knowledge at your fingertips,and willing to share = it,thanks much.=20 Hazen Bannister=20 Hazen, This is where experience comes in. It is always good to have the = original string sizes to use as a guide in developing a revised = stringing scale. As with others who have posted on this subject, I would = be very cautious about arbitrarily raising the overall string tensions = of any piano.=20 When I develop a stringing scale (whether it is for a piano we're doing = in-shop or simply a scale I'm working up for someone else) it is = generally a two-step process. First work out what the original = manufacturer put on there and then work out the modified scale. The wire = sizes may break in different places and there will nearly always be = half-size progressions rather than whole-size progressions but the = overall scale tensions in each section will generally be pretty close to = the original. The exception might be a piano having a very uneven scale = and that I'm familiar enough with and have enough experience with to = know the plate and structure can take some additional tension in a = particular area.=20 The idea with 'rescaling' is not to make the piano into something it was = never intended to be...you're not -- or shouldn't be trying -- to make = it 'more powerful' or some such thing. You should be trying to make it = more musical within the structural parameters of the original design. I've not been following this thread closely and don't know what piano = you're working with, but someone with enough experience -- say a couple = of thousand scales under his/her belt (or slide rule/four-function = calculator/programmable calculator/computer) can probably look at your = speaking length numbers and come with a well balanced and safe scale for = your piano without seeing it or analyzing it in person. Personally, I'd want to see the numbers from your specific piano before = choosing a bunch of wire sizes. The Travis book was an excellent tool in = its day but there are too many things that can change between the = factory model designation and the real world. Besides, some (most?) of = those factory scales leave lot to be desired even if you guess right. Del ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/af/0e/37/19/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC