improvements

[Erwinspiano@AOL.COM]

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
In a message dated 5/8/2002 12:28:04 AM Pacific Standard Time, 
john@musselwhite.com writes:


> Subj:Re: improvements 
> Date:5/8/2002 12:28:04 AM Pacific Standard Time
> From:<A HREF="mailto:john@musselwhite.com">john@musselwhite.com</A>
> Reply-to:<A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A>
> To:<A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A>
> Sent from the Internet 
> 
> 
>                   John

               Some don't know what there critical of.
             Dale

> At 11:06 AM 06/05/02 -0700, Del wrote:
> 
> 
> >>Or, how about the new and improved Model M with a cleaner, clearer bass, 
> >>a smoother bass/tenor crossover, an improved upper tenor/lower treble, a 
> >>cleaner treble and consistent action geometry?
> 
> Because if they did all that to it then it wouldn't be a Steinway anymore?
> 
> I look after some very nice newer Model M pianos that are very clean and 
> clear with a decent sounding bass/tenor break and that play quite well. 
> None of them are the "dogs" I hear people complaining about. Am I just 
> seeing the good ones or something?
> 
>                  John
> 


---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/5b/ca/80/ea/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--