Isaac OLEG SIMANOT wrote: > I probably want to "hear what I see" more than that ;>) > > Partial coincidence does not open my ears enough, in short, then with open > ears I can use the display, but will often tune a little different of it > (RCT). May be because nobody listening to music will listen to coincidence > of partials, or not in this way. > > But I am pretty sure you understand me. Yes, I understand, and I am one hundred percent with you. But thats really only a danger if you lean to heavily on the ETD to tune. I dont accept the single partial tuning curve as representing a "correct" or "acurate" tuning in that sense to begin with. What it IS, is simply a set of rules for arranging a particular tuning solution, and after its own fashion does an interesting enough and certainly "good" enough job of it. But I like using Tunelab to look for things about tuning. I still wish it was set up to display 4 frequencies at once, along with a couple other goodies. Tune Lab is a decent enough ETD, but it could be a knock out learning tool as well. > Regards. > > Isaac OLEG > -- Richard Brekne RPT, N.P.T.F. Bergen, Norway mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no http://home.broadpark.no/~rbrekne/ricmain.html
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC