First a small clarification: the highest overtones are the first to fade as the note decays. The longer you wait, the clearer your perception of the fundamental pitch becomes (or lowest perceivable partials); the higher partials no longer cause as much interference. In theory, if you wait until most of the overtones have subsided, it will be much easier to set the fundamental frequencies. But is this ultimately what shapes our perception of a unison? The majority of the time we probably experience unisons that are not that long in duration. It is that initial added disturbance that our ears are most often forced to deal with. While I agree that setting the unisons after some partials have decayed is an excellent method of getting a unison to sound clean, it really should be tempered by shorter durations in order to account for the interference of the higher partials. You have to balance both approaches to suit what you think most often will be experienced by the listener. The other thing to consider is that those small 'rolls' are not [as] perceivable once you are a short distance from the piano. Using this psychoacoustical phenomenon as an advantage, you can adjust the strings so that they are not perfectly in-tune in order to maximize on some addition volume and resonance: a very slight misalignment creates less destructive interference. Bradley M. Snook
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC