Older plastic was not very well developed, either Thump --- "Kevin E. Ramsey" <kevin.e.ramsey@cox.net> wrote: > > Well, when you think about it, the force from > the key goes through the elbow at a ninety degree > angle, and ALL of the force goes through the elbow. > So, as I see it, that part gets more of the stress > than any action part in the piano, with the > exception of the hammer, but then, why don't we see > more hammer flanges break? Could be that they have a > greater sectional density than that thin and long > elbow. > > > > I guess the elbows get more of an "impact" on them > than the flanges. > > At 04:20 PM 10/23/02 -0400, you wrote: > >That all makes perfectly good sense. However, > many of the ones I have run > across (should have run over?) have never had a > damp chaser installed. > >Perhaps they would have fallen apart sooner if > they had. Still the > flanges, etc. lasted far better than the elbows. > Maybe just wear & tear > from the movement? > >Fran Helms > __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site http://webhosting.yahoo.com/
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC