Bridge pin bit size -Phil Ford

Erwinspiano@aol.com Erwinspiano@aol.com
Sat, 26 Oct 2002 16:09:01 EDT


---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
In a message dated 10/26/2002 10:59:58 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
RNossaman@cox.net writes:


> <A HREF="mailto:RNossaman@cox.net">RNossaman@cox.net</A>
> Reply-to:<A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A>
> To:<A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A>
> Sent from the Internet 
> 
>            Ron

                 I get it.  I like the idea of the CA glue penetrating and 
supporting the fibrs without the damage from extra compression. Epoxy is 
great stuff for many applications but I hate the mess. Just me.
           Dale

> 
> 
> >>          Ron
> >>          The key word in your post was LAMINATED cap. I was referring to 
> 
> >> quater sawn maple caps and gaining more "compression resistance" I would 
> 
> >> certainly think the laminate cap would be a nice snug fit with the no.46 
> 
> >> bit. If the maple is hard and grain tight it is also nice a snug ,it's 
> >> only when it's not that a smaller bit will make a tighter better fit.
> 
> Ok, but the epoxy or CA will get you there too with the #46 and crush less 
> wood in the process.
> 
> Ron N
> 


---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/1d/e2/4a/c1/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC