---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
In a message dated 10/26/2002 10:59:58 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
RNossaman@cox.net writes:
> <A HREF="mailto:RNossaman@cox.net">RNossaman@cox.net</A>
> Reply-to:<A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A>
> To:<A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A>
> Sent from the Internet
>
> Ron
I get it. I like the idea of the CA glue penetrating and
supporting the fibrs without the damage from extra compression. Epoxy is
great stuff for many applications but I hate the mess. Just me.
Dale
>
>
> >> Ron
> >> The key word in your post was LAMINATED cap. I was referring to
>
> >> quater sawn maple caps and gaining more "compression resistance" I would
>
> >> certainly think the laminate cap would be a nice snug fit with the no.46
>
> >> bit. If the maple is hard and grain tight it is also nice a snug ,it's
> >> only when it's not that a smaller bit will make a tighter better fit.
>
> Ok, but the epoxy or CA will get you there too with the #46 and crush less
> wood in the process.
>
> Ron N
>
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/1d/e2/4a/c1/attachment.htm
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC