---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment In a message dated 10/26/2002 10:59:58 AM Pacific Daylight Time, RNossaman@cox.net writes: > <A HREF="mailto:RNossaman@cox.net">RNossaman@cox.net</A> > Reply-to:<A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A> > To:<A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A> > Sent from the Internet > > Ron I get it. I like the idea of the CA glue penetrating and supporting the fibrs without the damage from extra compression. Epoxy is great stuff for many applications but I hate the mess. Just me. Dale > > > >> Ron > >> The key word in your post was LAMINATED cap. I was referring to > > >> quater sawn maple caps and gaining more "compression resistance" I would > > >> certainly think the laminate cap would be a nice snug fit with the no.46 > > >> bit. If the maple is hard and grain tight it is also nice a snug ,it's > >> only when it's not that a smaller bit will make a tighter better fit. > > Ok, but the epoxy or CA will get you there too with the #46 and crush less > wood in the process. > > Ron N > ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/1d/e2/4a/c1/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC