---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment Erwinspiano@aol.com wrote: > > Richard > > >> Thanks for the balanced viewpoint here Richard > > Regards>>>Dale Erwin > > >> >> This discussion has gone back and forth for a hundred >> years or more now, and its been illustrated in >> innumerable ways throughout our tradition. One has a >> choice to make and one chooses based on what particular >> balancing of touch and tonal effects one wants. All that >> is fine. Where we go over the border is when we insist >> that there is some rational for declaring one particular >> preference is by definition superior to others. The >> areana simply does not fit the game as it were. And >> really folks... the diversity is one of our real >> strengths. The really new aspect of all of this >> development is the advent of a system for unprecedented >> evening >> > > > And thanks for your refreshing replies last nite (my time) and again today. I was meaning to send you a note about your review of stance on the patent question. Suffice to say it reflects your sense of honor and ethics in an admirable manner. My hat's off to you ! Cheers Dale :) RicB -- Richard Brekne RPT, N.P.T.F. UiB, Bergen, Norway mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no http://home.broadpark.no/~rbrekne/ricmain.html ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/6a/d4/17/02/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC