What is this continual diatribe? Why don't you worry more about the lies of politicians who make this world miserable for mankind? Geeezzzz, get a life! Is your world really that small? Terry Farrell ----- Original Message ----- From: <SidewaysWell1713@aol.com> To: <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 8:27 AM Subject: EBVT Imbalances Disproven > Here again is the big lie, Ed Foote wrote, knowing that it was not true and > for one purpose alone, to make himself the HT guru and to discredit the way > I've been successfully tuning pianos for 10 years: > > > > This > > doesn't change the fact that the ebvt creates a more tempered E-G# of > > 17+cents than the F#-A# of 13.7. It is folly to think that going up two > > semitones will somehow make the F# third seem to beat faster. It doesn't, > > and the harmonic balance is poor because of it. It is this break with > > tradition, (no other temperament I know of has this amount of imbalance in > > the progression of its thirds), that renders the ebvt an atypical > > arrangement > > and makes any claim of its author to its "authenticity" a pipedream. Scale > > placement cannot save this poor harmonic balance. > > In the past few days, I took Direct Interval measurements of several ordinary > pianos that I tuned. Ed Foote is on record as calling all of these "JUNK". > I'd like to see him go into the elegant, well appointed homes in the upper > middle class neighborhoods I did and say what he did right here on Pianotech. > These are all JUNK pianos, so of course the FAC program won't work. Yet, > this is the only information he offers, numbers copied out of a book. Just > look at the numbers, don't read anything else, just the numbers. So, what do > all of you out there who only tune JUNK do to compensate for a program Ed > Foote concedes will not work? > > If you were to believe Ed Foote, two of the pianos I tuned in an upscale > section of town at the elementary school where I have been the technician now > for 20 years, were JUNK. I have now for 10 years victimized the children of > that school by providing "poor harmonic balance" on their JUNK. I'd like to > put one of Ed's tune-by-numbers attempts up to some careful aural and > electronic scrutiny. I'm sure I'd find a few embarrassing stains in his > dirty laundry. > > ( n/r = not recorded) > > Piano B2-D#3 Db3-F3 E3-G#3 F#3-A#3 Ab3-C4 > > Walter Studio n/r n/r 15.8 18.8 n/r__ > Weber Grand 17.0 18.2 16.6 17.6 n/r > Acrosonic 16.1 18.7 14.3 18.6 14.8 > Yamaha P22 18.1 18.9 15.3 18.7 18.0 > Everett Studio 16.9 17.3 15.8 16.7 16.3 > Knabe Console 16.6 16.6 16.0 14.8 14.8 > Kawai Console 16.9 15.7 14.5 16.2 15.1 > > These figures contradict Ed Foote's lies and attempts at defamation when he > said that the EBVT is "full of imbalances". There aren't any imbalances at > all. It would be easy however to make slight errors and create them. Some of > these errors include: > > Initial F3-A3 set faster than 6 beats per second. > Making one of the pure intervals a little tempered of tempered the wrong way. > Stretching the octave a little too much. > > Ed Foote says he tried to tune the EBVT both aurally and electronically. If > he got the results he claims he got trying to tune the EBVT, how accurate can > his tunings be where he just copied numbers out of books? Or did he just > plain LIE about it? I don't believe or trust a thing Ed Foote says and never > will. > > > "Sideways Well": the pit Ed Foote dug for himself to wallow in the day he > knowingly published false data for the EBVT on Pianotech. > > Bill Bremmer RPT > Madison, Wisconsin > <A HREF="http://www.billbremmer.com/">Click here: -=w w w . b i l l b r e m m e r . c o m =-</A> > > > >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC