You who? Not me! I was just asking about the claim. Terry Farrell ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tony Caught" <caute@optusnet.com.au> To: "Pianotech" <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 4:13 AM Subject: Re: Piano Sound: was something else > So you says that a rim reflects or has to reflect ?. And why should it. ? > > Tony Caught > caute@optusnet.com.au > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Richard Brekne" <Richard.Brekne@grieg.uib.no> > To: "Pianotech" <pianotech@ptg.org> > Sent: Monday, September 16, 2002 5:13 PM > Subject: Piano Sound: was something else > > > > We keep ridiculing this, without really knowing what it refers too. > Similiar subjects come up and get discounted more or less out of hand also. > Yet much is made of the importance of string / soundboard impedance match to > sustain and power. Perhaps there are other "impedance matches" to the > strings energy that play an important / significant roll in the "end > product" sound of the piano. Perhaps its not so much a matter of whether one > rim reflects more or better then another... but rather that one rim > relfects an optimal amount.. ?? > > > > RicB > > > > Farrell wrote: > > > > > This is what I am describing on the S&S upright. And are you speaking in > reference to the "magic circle of sound"? Does a laminated rim "reflect" > sound better than a solid timber frame? > > > > > > Terry Farrell > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC