Testing Statistics.. was Important Question

[David Ilvedson]

Well, he just didn't add RPT after his name...FWIW...

David I.



     ----- Original message ---------------------------------------->
     From: Farrell <mfarrel2@tampabay.rr.com>
     To: Pianotech <pianotech@ptg.org>
     Received: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 15:20:48 -0400
     Subject: Re: Testing Statistics.. was Important Question

     >Boy, I dunno John. Maybe from the standpoint of being a good aural tuner you "did it
     >wrong". But if you have been tuning for 27 years, have a university contract, have had
     >no complaints, and have made a good living at it, hmmmmmm - I'd say you did somethi
     >Terry Farrell
     >
     >----- Original Message -----
     >From: "John Ross" <jrpiano@win.eastlink.ca>
     >To: <ilvey@sbcglobal.net>; "Pianotech" <pianotech@ptg.org>
     >Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2002 2:49 PM
     >Subject: Re: Testing Statistics.. was Important Question


     >> Hi David,
     >> I agree with you 100%.
     >> I am one who did it the wrong way. I started with the ETD too early,
     >> and never was able to pass the aural part of the exam.
     >> I turn 65 this year, and have been tuning since 1975. I have made a
     >> good living at it, and had no complaints from my customers. I have an
     >> ongoing contract with a University. I know I will never have the
     >> incentive to try the aural exam again.
     >> Best regards,
     >> John M. Ross
     >> Windsor, Nova Scotia.
     >> jrpiano@win.eastlink.ca

     >SNIP

     >_______________________________________________
     >pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives