Is it real or a toy Baby Grand?

Ken Reitz kreitz@optonline.net
Mon, 21 Apr 2003 22:43:10 -0400


> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment

The thing that gets me is that when I say =B3Schulz=B2 (without the T) most
people think I say =B3Schultz=B2 . This is a Schulz SN 225320.  Are they one in
the same?
The base string count on this one are 5 single and 16 double.



On 4/21/03 10:28 PM, "Ken Reitz" <kreitz@optonline.net> wrote:

> On 4/21/03 10:12 PM, "JWyatt1492@aol.com" <JWyatt1492@aol.com> wrote:
>=20
>> Hello Ken,=20
>>=20
>>    You have a real piano.
>>=20
>>     There were  two brands of these little
>> grands. One was built by M.Schultz and
>> the other by Story&Clark.
>>=20
>>     I own a S&C now and owned another
>> years ago. I have rebuilt one M. Schultz.
>> #212543 built in 1927.
>>    The Schultz  used a "Seaverns" 404
>>  Action and the Story&Clark used a "Thayer"
>>    =20
>>     The bass string count on the Story&Clark
>> is 8 single strings and 12 doubles.
>> The Schultz is 9 single strings and 15 double.
>>    =20
>>    I can't say that all of these little grands are
>> the same but both of the Story&Clarks were.
>>=20
>>    These pianos are not worth a great deal
>> but they are unique.  And all had  double
>> "gate" legs.=20
>>=20
>> Regards,=20
>> Jack Wyatt=20
>>=20
>>=20
>=20
> The thing that gets me is that when I say =B3Schulz=B2 (without the T) most p=
eople
> think I say =B3Schultz=B2 . This is a Schulz SN 225320.  Are they one in the =
same?



---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/c4/c8/bc/75/attachment.htm

---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--

This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC