I have no experience with squares, but which type of piano is potentially better for tone and action, a Baldwin Acrosonic spinet or a Chickering/Knabe/Steinway square? ----- Original message ----- From: "Farrell" <mfarrel2@tampabay.rr.com> To: "Pianotech" <pianotech@ptg.org> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 06:40:02 -0400 Subject: Re: Piano Funnies - August! Hey Joe. Not everyone is on that boat. Got a 9 AM appointment today to inspect a square and provide a rebuilding estimate. Seems to me that those who automatically write these off, write off a portion of their business and a portion of history. Please do not encourage destruction of these potentially stunning looking, but mediocre to good performing pianos (for the non-demanding pianist). Terry Farrell ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joseph Garrett" <joegarrett@earthlink.net> To: <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 11:23 PM Subject: Piano Funnies - August! > Ooh! For your sake, I hope Joe doesn't see this!!!! :-) > > Avery SNIP _______________________________________________ pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives -- Stephen Airy stephenairy@fastmail.fm
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC