Interesting. I remember one Steinway square I played that had a quite muffled / quiet low end bass, but a very long sustain. ----- Original message ----- From: "Farrell" <mfarrel2@tampabay.rr.com> To: "Pianotech" <pianotech@ptg.org> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 13:06:50 -0400 Subject: Re: Piano Funnies - August! Tone: top half, the Acrosonic - bottom half, the square (the bass strings are about 6-feet long on many of them. Action: I dunno. Set up properly I would say both can function reasonably well - not real high performance, mind you. Terry Farrell ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stephen Airy" <stephenairy@fastmail.fm> To: "Piano Tech list - PTG" <pianotech@ptg.org> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 12:10 PM Subject: Re: Piano Funnies - August! > I have no experience with squares, but which type of piano is potentially > better for tone and action, a Baldwin Acrosonic spinet or a > Chickering/Knabe/Steinway square? _______________________________________________ pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives -- Stephen Airy stephenairy@fastmail.fm
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC