---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
In a message dated 8/19/2003 9:57:14 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
pianobuilders@olynet.com writes:
> Subj: Re: Laminated ribs
> Date: 8/19/2003 9:57:14 AM Pacific Daylight Time
> From: <A HREF="mailto:pianobuilders@olynet.com">pianobuilders@olynet.com</A>
> Reply-to: <A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A>
> To: <A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A>
> Sent from the Internet
>
>
>
>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: <A HREF="mailto:Erwinspiano@aol.com">Erwinspiano@aol.com</A>
>> To: <A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A>
>> Sent: August 19, 2003 7:30 AM
>> Subject: Re: Laminated ribs
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> At roughly5mm per thickness either would bend easily in a caul. The
>> laminations are still quarter sawn stock. Flat sawn stock would bend even
>> easier but wouldn't be quite as stiff.
>> Dale Erwin
>>
>
> We've done it both ways--vertical-grain and flat-sawn--and if there is a
> difference in either bending qualities, springback or stiffness we've been
> unable to detect it.
>
> Del
>
I wondered about that myself. Uhhh stuck my foot in that one ehhh?
Dale Erwin
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/1d/44/2b/07/attachment.htm
---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC