---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment In a message dated 8/19/2003 9:57:14 AM Pacific Daylight Time, pianobuilders@olynet.com writes: > Subj: Re: Laminated ribs > Date: 8/19/2003 9:57:14 AM Pacific Daylight Time > From: <A HREF="mailto:pianobuilders@olynet.com">pianobuilders@olynet.com</A> > Reply-to: <A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A> > To: <A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A> > Sent from the Internet > > > > > >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: <A HREF="mailto:Erwinspiano@aol.com">Erwinspiano@aol.com</A> >> To: <A HREF="mailto:pianotech@ptg.org">pianotech@ptg.org</A> >> Sent: August 19, 2003 7:30 AM >> Subject: Re: Laminated ribs >> >> >> >> >> At roughly5mm per thickness either would bend easily in a caul. The >> laminations are still quarter sawn stock. Flat sawn stock would bend even >> easier but wouldn't be quite as stiff. >> Dale Erwin >> > > We've done it both ways--vertical-grain and flat-sawn--and if there is a > difference in either bending qualities, springback or stiffness we've been > unable to detect it. > > Del > I wondered about that myself. Uhhh stuck my foot in that one ehhh? Dale Erwin ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/1d/44/2b/07/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC