---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment Grin... DUH !!!! And I had to ask.... Didnt even look twice at my own conversion from inches to mm. (2 inches). I knew there had to be something simple I was missing... Thanks. Now we can get into whether or not his 2 inches was a good call... :) yes ?? Cheers RicB "David M. Porritt" wrote Well, he said the bore would have to be 2-inches (50.8mm). If the stack were raised 2.8mm, that would allow a 48mm bore. As I mentioned, it could screw up everything else too, but I thought it worth looking at as a possibility (I have seen actions screwed up in all kinds of ways). I know one factory that used to keep several different sized blocks for mounting the stack depending on the string height. dave *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 8/20/2003 at 5:31 PM Richard Brekne wrote: Grin... Ok David P... you got me scratching my head here... How do you come up with a stack raise of 2.8 mm to achieve 0 rake, 48 mm bore and no overcentering based on the info Bob sent in ?... Cheers RicB -- Richard Brekne RPT, N.P.T.F. UiB, Bergen, Norway mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no http://home.broadpark.no/~rbrekne/ricmain.html http://www.hf.uib.no/grieg/personer/cv_RB.html ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/ef/15/74/71/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC