"David C. Stanwood" wrote: > At 10:17 AM 6/10/03 +0200, you wrote: > >When somebody can put forward physics/mathematical proofs or reasonings > >that show conclusively (or even close to conclusively) that static > >balancing is a meaningless componet for any wholistic concept of dynamic > >balance, then perhaps we on this side of the fence will take notice. > > Thanks for your comments Richard.... However no proofs or reasoning will > override the simple truth of whether or not pianists like it... > > Right? > > David S. > Yes, in the end... the most convincing argument of them all. And so far the evidence is hands down no bones about it, pianists do notice and do like it. Cheers RicB -- Richard Brekne RPT, N.P.T.F. UiB, Bergen, Norway mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no http://home.broadpark.no/~rbrekne/ricmain.html http://www.hf.uib.no/grieg/personer/cv_RB.html
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC