This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment Sarah, we really didn't think that it was coming directly from you, = dear.. We covered this a few weeks ago, about how just one of your = messages on someone else's computer can make it appear to come from you. = =20 You're just fine with me, at least. Kevin By the way, your viewpoint on the matter is point-on, as usual. ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Sarah Fox=20 To: Pianotech=20 Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 6:35 PM Subject: Re: OT Virus: Not I! > Hi List, > > My Mailwasher has just detected a virus from Sarah Fox @ = Goldrush.com, with > the subject "Key leads and inertia" Yikes! I got it too. Since I don't often send emails to myself -- or = to any of my other alter egos -- I treated it with considerable suspicion = and did not open the attachment. My computer is free of viruses, unless this is something not yet = profiled in the Norton/Symantec virus definitions. The virus apparently came from someone else, as evidenced by the header (read in order from the last "received" line to the first): Return-path: <sarah@goldrush.com> Received by etc., etc. -- the normal route to my computer. (I've = omitted all but my reflector address because these messages get archived, and = I don't want to get spam through my primary address!) Received: from mail.surferz.net (mail.surferz.net [64.80.52.17]) by tnmx01.mgw.rr.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h5O0859h021846 = for XXXXXX@XXXXXXX; Mon, 23 Jun 2003 20:08:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from sv.compuland.com.br (sv.compuland.com.br = [200.255.96.21]) by mail.surferz.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h5O05QOG025995 for <sarah@gendernet.org>; Mon, 23 Jun 2003 20:05:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from theboss (dial539.compuland.com.br [200.214.11.190]) by sv.compuland.com.br (8.12.5/8.12.9) with SMTP id h5O00pQd013316; = Mon, 23 Jun 2003 21:00:54 -0300 (BRT envelope-from sarah@goldrush.com) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 21:00:51 -0300 (BRT) From: Sarah Fox <sarah@goldrush.com> Subject: Re: Key Leads and Inertia Thus, the email originated from a brazilian address with a return = address that I've never had (sarah@goldrush.com). It purportedly made its way = from "theboss" (dial539.compuland.com.br) to my address at gendernet.org = and then was reflected through Norton to my cable internet server. "Theboss" = is probably not to blame -- probably another forgery. The content of the virus-forged email was most likely gleaned from the PianoTech archives. If the virus works like most worms, it probably = mailed itself, with the forged content, to everyone in the infected = computer's address book. Therefore it's probably one of us. It's most likely = someone who has been visiting the archives -- again, not I. Soooo.... If you've visited the archives lately and have both myself = and Alan -- and now Bill Ballard -- in your address book (probably if = you've sent us all emails privately), do a virus scan! (Note: for those = concerned, I have neither in my address book. I checked.) Peace, Sarah _______________________________________________ pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/28/6a/00/6d/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC