Mark Davidson wrote: > I retook some strikeweights with tail down, and found David Love was are > right. Didn't get a whole > gram difference, but consistently heavier. Still bugs me that there is no > guarantee > the tail is centered under the hammer, but oh well. > > note old new(tail down) > 88 6.0 6.2 > 78 7.0 7.4 > 68 8.3 8.7 > 58 9.3 9.5 > 48 10.0 10.1 > 38 9.8 10.1 > 28 10.2 10.4 > 18 10.5 10.7 > 8 10.7 11.1 > > I suspect that lowers my average SWR to closer to 6.0 from around 6.2-6.3. Thats a pretty good guesstimation. And again... this shows how important it is to be sure of ones measurements... a 0.25 change in ratio is kinda an important detail ... grin... Still... I think the basic recommendation stands for this instrument... Put your Strikeweights on a number 7 or 8 curve, and either Frontweight up to the Stanwood maximums, or move your capline in a couple mm before figuring your Frontweights. > > > David Love wrote: > > Mark: > > > > Go to this site and look at the way the SW is taken. I have a suspicion > > that the way you did it recorded a SW of at least 1 gram lower than it > > actually is. Nice call David :) Cheers RicB -- Richard Brekne RPT, N.P.T.F. UiB, Bergen, Norway mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no http://home.broadpark.no/~rbrekne/ricmain.html http://www.hf.uib.no/grieg/personer/cv_RB.html
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC