Bob writes;
<< You could remove the performer as a factor by using one of the
high-end automated player systems to do the performance for recording. >>
Greetings,
This idea brings up another consideration, and I think it is critical.
The inequality of tempering is only a resource, and the final product that we
hear is basically the pianists' use of the resources available. That means a
pianist will interpret the music differently, depending on the response of
the instrument, and changing the temperament most definitely changes the
response of the piano. Using a mechanical reproduction will erase this. It
might make the comparison more "scientific", but will have little validity in
determining musical "value", since the value of WT's is tremendously
dependant on the pianists ability to use the added complexity of the
inequality. It may also be the reason that a listener who cannot detect the
difference between ET and WT is unable to realize the added value of other
tunings.
For this reason, my investigation and decisions regarding the temperaments
has relied on the response of the performers, (and to some degree, listeners)
rather than the theoretical pros and cons found in the technical
community.,(yes, that is a pun).
I gave the example of two remote key compositions for demonstrating the
use of highly tempered keys, last week. In response, it was posted that
these didn't illuminate the character of the keys because they were,if I
remember correctly, in the words of the poster, "lyrical". The mood of the
piece doesn't DEPEND on the amount of tempering, it depends on how the
pianist plays it. Or, in other words, (Enid Katahn's words), "The pianist
can chose to play it dissonantly or expressively".
It is her, and others contention, that composers chose the keys that they
did for harmonic reasons, and their writing took advantage of the resources
found in the various keys. It was not as simple as pure thirds for this, and
tempered thirds for that. The WT's are more complex than ET because they
have a variety of harmonic values, they are not a homogenized set. The
opposition of the fifths and thirds makes analysis of why a key was chosen
dependant on the composer's intention, ie, there is a difference between a
passage of pure melodic intervals juxtaposed over a highly tempered harmony
and one in which the melodic line makes use of "expressive" melodic intervals
played against a very consonant harmony. How things are
voiced,(pianistically, not by needles), is heavily influenced by the
pianist's taste, and this is lost when a reproducer mechanism is playing.
It is natural that we, of 20th century persuasion, want to test all
things in a scientific manner, however, emotional and musical expression
often resides in a spiritual realm, where science is forbidden to go.
Regards,
Ed Foote RPT
www.uk-piano.org/edfoote/
www.uk-piano.org/edfoote/well_tempered_piano.html
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC