This may not be sometrhing that can easily be
measured, but I am quite certain that it is something
that a pianist can feel, i.e. 3 separate fulcrums per
keystroke, vs 1.
Thump
--- Ron Nossaman <RNossaman@cox.net> wrote:
>
> >Personally, I'm not convinced that S&S's
> accelerated action really does
> >anything. The shift in fulcrum would be miniscule,
> hardly enough to make
> >any sort of measurable difference in either the
> action ratio or the key's
> >moment of inertia. There would *technically* be
> shifts in these values, of
> >course. Technically, the mechanical advantage over
> the capstan end would
> >decrease as the key is depressed.
>
> Realistically, the effective fulcrum point is going
> to shift more rocking a
> flat key across a well compressed flat punching than
> across a half round
> dowel. Maybe the benefit is that the fulcrum point
> *doesn't* move, and the
> key leverage *doesn't* change as much through the
> stroke.
>
> Ron N
>
> _______________________________________________
> pianotech list info:
https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC