David writes:
> such things as the addition of cutoff bars, belly bracing, modifying the
>bass bridge cantilever to increase backscale length, detuning the front
>duplexes, rescaling, squaring the bridge notching in the low tenor and bass
sections, crowing the
>ribs, ; All of these "redesigns", will improve the overall
>performance of the piano and I don't consider it in any way a desecration
>of the original, just an improvement.
Greetings,
Hmm, maybe I should wait until you define "desecration". This list
of "things to do" is more than refining makers' oversights, it is
re-engineering the sounding structure. How far can a Steinway get its sound
improved without sounding like something other than a Steinway? I would
question, are we simply continuing on the developmental trajectory that the
originators of Steinways had in mind, or are we attempting to invent our own
sound by using a Steinway as our bass, (treble ahead?).
Ed Foote RPT
www.uk-piano.org/edfoote/
www.uk-piano.org/edfoote/well_tempered_piano.html
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC