>At 3:01 PM -0500 5/16/03, Avery Todd wrote: >>Bill, >> >>I don't understand this. The aftertouch is "part" of the dip. It >>sounds like you're regulating >>them independently! > >I sure am. It's the greatest thing since sliced bread (and I can >support that claim <g>) No, I'm not. While I may rough in dip earlier in the regulation or rebuilding, when I do aftertouch, it's using he same FR punchings which help to define dip. Aftertouch is set and dip doesn't get corrected. (In my approach, why should it.) The regulating is independent to the extent that dip and aftertouch are set at two separate times, thew priority given to aftertouch means that, while aftertouch is not dependant on dip, what dip ends up being depends on the regulation of aftertouch. I can still support the claim that this is the greatest thing since sliced bread. Thanks, everyone, for not reading this post too closely. Bill Ballard RPT NH Chapter, P.T.G. "A jester unemployed is nobody's fool." ...........Danny Kaye, in "The Court Jester" +++++++++++++++++++++
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC