This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment This is from another tech who does regulation and some hammer hanging = but went with the prehungs this time. She thought it was a real pain to = space and align this way and still doesn't like it. Keith Roberts ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Richard Brekne=20 To: Pianotech=20 Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 10:39 PM Subject: Re: Steinway bore angles I think you'd be best off by having a look see for yourself. Course = you already knew that, but it brings up nicely the subject matter of how = much we can trust an owners assessment of an instrument... and how much = we cant. In anycase one needs to be real carefull about making any = suggestions or comments based on other then first hand information... = yes ???=20 Cute !! :)=20 Cheers Keith=20 RicB=20 Keith Roberts wrote:=20 You're right, my misunderstanding. She said normally they were = angled across the strings one way and now they were they opposite. What = she meant was the string angle is about twelve degrees and the hammer is = angled 18 degrees. Usually it's less than the string angle. Spacing and = string alignment was very difficult. This was on a "M". The hammers were = prehung from Steinway. Still doesn't seem right to me.Keith Roberts=20 Get outa here !! :).... Bass hammers angled the same as the tenor = ??????? And it aint even April 1st :)=20 RicB=20 Keith Roberts wrote: --=20 Richard Brekne=20 RPT, N.P.T.F.=20 UiB, Bergen, Norway=20 mailto:rbrekne@broadpark.no=20 http://home.broadpark.no/~rbrekne/ricmain.html=20 http://www.hf.uib.no/grieg/personer/cv_RB.html=20 =20 ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://www.moypiano.com/ptg/pianotech.php/attachments/a6/f8/94/fb/attachment.htm ---------------------- multipart/alternative attachment--
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC