Well Put, On Tuesday, November 4, 2003, at 06:15 AM, Clyde Hollinger wrote: > Friends, > > Yesterday I got a large postcard advertisement from Inventronics about > the > Accu-Tuner. I presume most of you did, too, or will soon. I find the > ad to be > in very poor taste. Using phrases against their competitors, such as > wild > accuracy claims, being fooled, science fiction, being tricked -- it is > hard to > believe they would stoop this low. > > Please understand that I am not denigrating the Accu-Tuner machine. > When I made > my decision some years ago, before Verituner was available, I felt > that either > RCT (Reyburn Cyber-Tuner for those who aren't familiar with the > acronyms) or SAT > II (Sanderson Accu-Tuner, the latest model at that time) would have > served me > well. I decided to go with RCT. I like being able to enter data on a > standard > computer keyboard. > > I have not regretted that decision, and I think that if I had chosen > SAT I would > have learned to like that machine, too. If I were choosing now, > Verituner might > get my dollars. In my opinion the continuous sampling is a great > feature, but I > like the compact size and shape of what I'm using now (RCT installed > on a > Toshiba Libretto 110CT). > > I don't really want to start ETD (electronic tuning device) arguments > again on > this list, but it might happen anyway. What got me started is this ad > I > received. > > Regards, Clyde > > > > _______________________________________________ > pianotech list info: https://www.moypiano.com/resources/#archives >
This PTG archive page provided courtesy of Moy Piano Service, LLC